You can't answer the "AI share-of-voice" question
Your CMO wants to know how often AI search quotes your content. Vendor dashboards each count it differently. You need a number you can explain: which prompts, which engine, which page.
For content marketers
A content team gets its articles cited by ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini by making each answer easy to lift: a direct answer near the top, question-style headings, schema, and open access for AI crawlers. Then it checks which citations send readers.
The gap between an article a person enjoys and one a model can quote from is a format gap. It is the usual reason good content goes uncited, and you can check it per article.
The workflow
Step 1
Paste the URL into the Citation Readiness Score. You get a 0-100 score in about 90 seconds, no signup, plus the one fix to make first. Start with an article that already ranks on Google for a question your buyers ask.
Step 2
Put a direct answer in the first paragraph, phrase key H2s as questions, add Article and author schema, and let AI crawlers in through robots.txt. The Fix Kit ranks every issue worst-first, and the generator writes the llms.txt, JSON-LD and crawler allowlist for you. Then add the same checks to your brief template.
Step 3
When a reader clicks a ChatGPT citation, GA4 records the visit with source chatgpt.com. Filter by that source and landing page to see which articles are cited and clicked. The four checks for ChatGPT citations walk through it.
Step 4
Clicks only show part of it. Run a fixed set of prompts on a schedule and count how often your pages are cited. That count is your citation share, and it is how you answer the CMO. How to measure AI citation share.
Want the tracking done for you? CitationDesk Pro is a weekly report, €29/mo at the founding price. It finds citations of your pages through Gemini grounding and OpenAI web search (Perplexity is being added) and lines them up with your Search Console clicks once you connect it.
What we hear from content marketers
Your CMO wants to know how often AI search quotes your content. Vendor dashboards each count it differently. You need a number you can explain: which prompts, which engine, which page.
An "ultimate guide" can hold a good Google position while ChatGPT or Perplexity quotes a different source for the same question. The usual cause is format: the answer is buried under an intro the model can't lift.
Briefs cover word count, H2 sub-headings and keywords. None of those make an answer quotable on their own. Briefs need a short section for the direct answer, question headings and schema.
How CitationDesk fits
Ask ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini your top buyer questions and note which articles get cited. For the ones that don't, the free score explains why, per article, with the specific format gap named.
For each article that isn't cited, the Citation Readiness Score lists the checks it fails and the fix to make first. Add those fixes to your brief template, hand the list to your editors, then watch the chatgpt.com source in GA4 for clicked citations.
For a per-query, per-engine share-of-voice number tracked week over week, pair the free audit with a dedicated monitoring platform. We compare the options honestly.
Worked example
HoldLens is a niche reference site. It fixed five structural gaps and went from 0 to 10% ChatGPT inbound traffic in 14 days. The same five fixes apply to a content team's evergreen articles.
Read the case study →FAQ
Paste any URL. 90 seconds. 0-100 score across six dimensions plus the highest-leverage fix you can ship this week.
Or skip pasting a URL — email me a free sample AI-visibility report instead.